Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: improve platform profile handling

From: Hridesh MG
Date: Thu Jan 02 2025 - 01:51:24 EST


On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 2:28 AM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -1946,12 +2038,10 @@ static int acer_thermal_profile_change(void)
> > u8 current_tp;
> > int tp, err;
> > u64 on_AC;
> > - acpi_status status;
> > -
> > - err = ec_read(ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_EC_OFFSET,
> > - &current_tp);
> >
> > - if (err < 0)
> > + err = WMID_gaming_get_misc_setting(ACER_WMID_MISC_SETTING_PLATFORM_PROFILE,
> > + &current_tp);
> > + if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > /* Check power source */
> > @@ -1962,54 +2052,52 @@ static int acer_thermal_profile_change(void)
> > switch (current_tp) {
> > case ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO:
> > if (!on_AC)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED;
> > else if (cycle_gaming_thermal_profile)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_ECO_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_ECO;
> > else
> > tp = last_non_turbo_profile;
> > break;
> > case ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
> > if (!on_AC)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED;
> > else
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO;
> > break;
> > case ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED:
> > if (!on_AC)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_ECO_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_ECO;
> > else if (cycle_gaming_thermal_profile)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE;
> > else
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO;
> > break;
> > case ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_QUIET:
> > if (!on_AC)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED;
> > else if (cycle_gaming_thermal_profile)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED;
> > else
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO;
> > break;
> > case ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_ECO:
> > if (!on_AC)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED;
> > else if (cycle_gaming_thermal_profile)
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_QUIET_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_QUIET;
> > else
> > - tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO_WMI;
> > + tp = ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO;
> > break;
> > default:
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
>
> This needs a bit more work, since you might accidentally select unsupported platform profiles this way.
>
> Using platform_profile_cycle() would make sense here, but we still need to handle "on_AC". I however wonder
> if that is really necessary.
>
>From my testing, what I've found out is that even if we don't handle
on_AC, the profile is still set but the hardware will not put the
changes into effect until we plug in AC.

I've incorporated the rest of the changes into v2, thanks for the feedback!

--
Thanks,
Hridesh MG