On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:52:49 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
Having slept on it, I think you're right.It is more like removing broken functionality than fixing (maybe wholeI defer to other maintainers. The gaps are trivial to fill in, we'll
commit should be reverted). Anyway returning not support is also fine.
do so as soon as this patch makes it to net-next (this patch needs to
target net).
Su Hui, could you send a revert of d85ebade02e8 instead?
It's around 126 LoC, not too bad.