Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] tracing: Use __free() for kprobe events to cleanup

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue,  7 Jan 2025 20:50:35 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -1898,7 +1899,8 @@ create_local_trace_kprobe(char *func, void *addr, unsigned long offs,
>  			  bool is_return)
>  {
>  	enum probe_print_type ptype;
> -	struct trace_kprobe *tk;
> +	struct trace_kprobe *tk __free(free_trace_kprobe) = NULL;
> +	struct trace_probe *tp;
>  	int ret;
>  	char *event;
>  
> @@ -1929,19 +1931,16 @@ create_local_trace_kprobe(char *func, void *addr, unsigned long offs,
>  
>  	ptype = trace_kprobe_is_return(tk) ?
>  		PROBE_PRINT_RETURN : PROBE_PRINT_NORMAL;
> -	if (traceprobe_set_print_fmt(&tk->tp, ptype) < 0) {
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto error;
> -	}
> +	if (traceprobe_set_print_fmt(&tk->tp, ptype) < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	ret = __register_trace_kprobe(tk);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto error;
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  
> -	return trace_probe_event_call(&tk->tp);
> -error:
> -	free_trace_kprobe(tk);
> -	return ERR_PTR(ret);


> +	tp = &tk->tp;
> +	tk = NULL;	/* 'tk' is registered successfully, so do not free. */

I wonder if we could change the above to just:

	tp = &(no_free_ptr(tk)->tp);

?

-- Steve

> +	return trace_probe_event_call(tp);
>  }
>  
>  void destroy_local_trace_kprobe(struct trace_event_call *event_call)