Re: [PATCH 08/14] padata: switch padata_find_next() to using cpumask_next_wrap()

[Daniel Jordan]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 10:49:40AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively means
> the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.
> 
> cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>