Re: [PATCH V6 02/15] cpufreq: Add cpufreq_table_len()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 08-01-25, 12:50, Greg KH wrote:
> Odd, why can't Rust also know where CPUFREQ_TABLE_END is?  Why do you
> have to do extra work here?  That feels wrong.

Well, it can, sure.

The freq table the Rust code receives is part of the C code:
bindings::cpufreq_frequency_table. Since it is a C managed pointer, I thought it
is better to do the parsing in C code itself. In case the implementation of the
struct changes in future (unlikely though), we would only need to fix the C code
and not Rust, which looks to be the right expectation.

-- 
viresh