Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need to

[Johannes Thumshirn]

On 09.01.25 13:35, Filipe Manana wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
>> index 30f17eb7b6a8a1dfa9f66ed5508da42a70db1fa3..f060c04c7f76357e6d2c6ba78a8ba981e35645bd 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
>> @@ -478,8 +478,9 @@ static int run_test(test_func_t test, u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
>>                  ret = PTR_ERR(root);
>>                  goto out;
>>          }
>> -       btrfs_set_super_compat_ro_flags(root->fs_info->super_copy,
>> +       btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(root->fs_info->super_copy,
>>                                          BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID_STRIPE_TREE);
> This hunk seems unrelated to the rest of the patch, could be fixed in
> a different patch in case it actually solves any problem (probably
> not, but it's an incompat feature so it should be changed anyway).

I'll make it a separate patch. RST is an incompat feature not a compat one.

With this patch btrfs_delete_raid_extent() starts checking the incompat 
bit so it is fixing a 'problem'.