Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] perf tools: Use generic syscall scripts for all archs
From: Charlie Jenkins
Date: Thu Jan 09 2025 - 18:01:19 EST
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 06:51:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 05:49:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > BTW this series is already pushed out to perf-tools-next:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/log/?h=perf-tools-next
>
> Hey, now I noticed that with this latest version we see:
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ m
> make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf'
> BUILD: Doing 'make -j28' parallel build
> Warning: Kernel ABI header differences:
> diff -u tools/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>
> Auto-detecting system features:
> ... libdw: [ on ]
> ... glibc: [ on ]
> ... libbfd: [ on ]
> ... libbfd-buildid: [ on ]
> ... libelf: [ on ]
> ... libnuma: [ on ]
> ... numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ]
> ... libperl: [ on ]
> ... libpython: [ on ]
> ... libcrypto: [ on ]
> ... libunwind: [ on ]
> ... libcapstone: [ on ]
> ... llvm-perf: [ on ]
> ... zlib: [ on ]
> ... lzma: [ on ]
> ... get_cpuid: [ on ]
> ... bpf: [ on ]
> ... libaio: [ on ]
> ... libzstd: [ on ]
>
> /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/scripts/syscalltbl.sh --abis common,32,i386 /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h
> /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/scripts/syscalltbl.sh --abis common,64 /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h
> GEN /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/common-cmds.h
> GEN /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/sysreg-defs.h
> PERF_VERSION = 6.13.rc2.gd73982c39183
> GEN perf-archive
> GEN perf-iostat
> MKDIR /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/jvmti/
> MKDIR /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/jvmti/
> MKDIR /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/jvmti/
> MKDIR /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/jvmti/
>
>
> While with the previous one we would see something like SYSCALLTBL as
> the step name, like we have GEN, MKDIR, etc, can you take a look?
Ooh okay I see, the quiet commands were being ignored as-is. We could
add the lines to handle this to Makefile.syscalls, but I think the
better solution is to move the lines from Makefile.build to
Makefile.perf to be more generically available. Here is a patch for
that. I also added the comment from the kernel Makefile describing what
this does.