Re: [PATCH] x86/reboot: Don't corrupt memory on non-BIOS systems
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Jan 09 2025 - 22:24:22 EST
On January 9, 2025 12:43:52 PM PST, Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>native_machine_emergency_restart() writes unconditionally
>to the physical address of 0x472 to pass the warm reboot
>flags to BIOS. The BIOS reads this on booting to bypass memory
>test and do the warm boot. On the non-BIOS systems, other
>means have to be employed, and this write is a memory corruption.
>
>Fix that by moving the offending write into the case where
>the machine is rebooted via BIOS.
>
>Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
>index 615922838c51..6eec8653493f 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
>@@ -637,9 +637,8 @@ static void native_machine_emergency_restart(void)
>
> tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_REBOOT);
>
>- /* Tell the BIOS if we want cold or warm reboot */
>+ /* Tell the firmware if we want cold or warm reboot */
> mode = reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM ? 0x1234 : 0;
>- *((unsigned short *)__va(0x472)) = mode;
>
> /*
> * If an EFI capsule has been registered with the firmware then
>@@ -681,6 +680,7 @@ static void native_machine_emergency_restart(void)
> break;
>
> case BOOT_BIOS:
>+ *((unsigned short *)__va(0x472)) = mode;
> machine_real_restart(MRR_BIOS);
>
> /* We're probably dead after this, but... */
>
>base-commit: eea6e4b4dfb8859446177c32961c96726d0117be
Which system have you seen where this "corrupts" memory?