Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Update Event Records to CXL spec rev 3.1

[Dave Jiang]

On 1/10/25 9:46 AM, Shiju Jose wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 10 January 2025 16:07
>> To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx;
>> nifan.cxl@xxxxxxxxx; vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx; ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx;
>> dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> Linuxarm <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Update Event Records to CXL spec rev 3.1
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:55:50 +0000
>> <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add updates in the CXL events records and CXL trace events
>>> implementations for the changes in CXL spec rev 3.1.
>>>
>>> Shiju Jose (6):
>>>   cxl/events: Update Common Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>   cxl/events: Add Component Identifier formatting for CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>   cxl/events: Update General Media Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>   cxl/events: Update DRAM Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>   cxl/events: Update Memory Module Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>   cxl/test: Update test code for event records to CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>
>>> Changes:
>>> V4 -> V5
>>> 1. Reverted changes made in v4 for overcoming parsing error when
>>> libtraceevent in userspace parses the CXL trace events, for rasdaemon.
>>> This was due to trace event's format file is larger than PAGE_SIZE,
>>> not supported reading complete format file in one go in the kernel and
>>> thus fixed in the rasdaemon.
>>
>> Great to see that resolved.
>>
>>> 2. Rebased to v6.13-rc5.
>>
>> Should probably say why when doing a rebase to something other than rc1.
>> In this case this is what cxl.git/next is based on after some fixes earlier in the
>> cycle so a sensible choice for this set.
> 
> I checked. These patches applied cleanly in cxl.git/next and buid okay. 

Hi Shiju,
Can you please apply Ira's suggestions and respin a v6? Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> Shiju
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned this set is ready to go, but more eyes always good if
>> anyone has time! Same for the ras-daemon series once this is queued for the
>> kernel.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>> 3. Tested with rasdaemon and ras-mc-ctl tools updated for CXL spec rev 3.1
>>>    event record changes.
>