Re: [PATCH v22 00/20] tracing: fprobe: function_graph: Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph
From: Andrii Nakryiko
Date: Fri Jan 10 2025 - 19:05:02 EST
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 5:21 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 02:11:16PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 22nd version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
> > function-graph tracer. The previous version is;
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/173379652547.973433.2311391879173461183.stgit@devnote2/
> >
> > This version is rebased on v6.13-rc4 with fixes on [3/20] for x86-32 and
> > [5/20] for build error.
>
>
> hi,
> I ran the bench and I'm seeing native_sched_clock being used
> again kretprobe_multi bench:
>
> 5.85% bench [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_sched_clock
> |
> ---native_sched_clock
> sched_clock
> |
> --5.83%--trace_clock_local
> ftrace_return_to_handler
> return_to_handler
> syscall
> bpf_prog_test_run_opts
completely unrelated, Jiri, but we should stop using
bpf_prog_test_run_opts() for benchmarking. It goes through FD
refcounting, which is unnecessary tiny overhead, but more importantly
it causes cache line bouncing between multiple CPUs (when doing
multi-threaded benchmarks), which skews and limits results.
> trigger_producer_batch
> start_thread
> __GI___clone3
>
> I recall we tried to fix that before with [1] change, but that replaced
> later with [2] changes
>
> When I remove the trace_clock_local call in __ftrace_return_to_handler
> than the kretprobe-multi gets much faster (see last block below), so it
> seems worth to make it optional
>
> there's some decrease in kprobe_multi benchmark compared to base numbers,
> which I'm not sure yet why, but other than that it seems ok
>
> base:
> kprobe : 12.873 ± 0.011M/s
> kprobe-multi : 13.088 ± 0.052M/s
> kretprobe : 6.339 ± 0.003M/s
> kretprobe-multi: 7.240 ± 0.002M/s
>
> fprobe_on_fgraph:
> kprobe : 12.816 ± 0.002M/s
> kprobe-multi : 12.126 ± 0.004M/s
> kretprobe : 6.305 ± 0.018M/s
> kretprobe-multi: 7.740 ± 0.003M/s
>
> removed native_sched_clock call:
> kprobe : 12.850 ± 0.006M/s
> kprobe-multi : 12.115 ± 0.006M/s
> kretprobe : 6.270 ± 0.017M/s
> kretprobe-multi: 9.190 ± 0.005M/s
>
>
> happy new year ;-) thanks,
>
> jirka
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/172615389864.133222.14452329708227900626.stgit@devnote2/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240914214805.779822616@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
[...]