Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32: Drop unnecessary DT property presence check

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sun Jan 12 2025 - 10:27:08 EST


On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:23:25 -0600
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There's no reason to check for regulator supply property presence before
> calling devm_regulator_get_optional() as that will return -ENODEV if
> the supply is not present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The diff context doesn't show it, but the next line returns on error
> other than -ENODEV.
Thanks for that. Saved me opening the file.

Applied to the testing branch of iio.git. Probably next cycle material now.

Jonathan

>
> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c
> index 2201ee9987ae..0914148d1a22 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c
> @@ -615,8 +615,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_core_switches_probe(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> /* Booster can be used to supply analog switches (optional) */
> - if (priv->cfg->has_syscfg & HAS_VBOOSTER &&
> - of_property_read_bool(np, "booster-supply")) {
> + if (priv->cfg->has_syscfg & HAS_VBOOSTER) {
> priv->booster = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "booster");
> if (IS_ERR(priv->booster)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(priv->booster);
> @@ -628,8 +627,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_core_switches_probe(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> /* Vdd can be used to supply analog switches (optional) */
> - if (priv->cfg->has_syscfg & HAS_ANASWVDD &&
> - of_property_read_bool(np, "vdd-supply")) {
> + if (priv->cfg->has_syscfg & HAS_ANASWVDD) {
> priv->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vdd");
> if (IS_ERR(priv->vdd)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(priv->vdd);