Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Move DSI mode check to _atomic_check()
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Mon Jan 13 2025 - 04:14:14 EST
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 12:57:36AM +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
>
> At present, the DSI mode configuration check happens during the
> _atomic_enable() phase, which is not really the best place for this.
> Moreover, if the mode is not valid, the driver gives a warning and
> continues the hardware configuration.
>
> Move the DSI mode configuration check to _atomic_check() instead, which
> can properly report back any invalid mode, before the _enable phase even
> begins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> index 5db5dbbbcaad..b785df45bc59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct cdns_dsi {
> bool link_initialized;
> bool phy_initialized;
> struct phy *dphy;
> + struct cdns_dsi_cfg dsi_cfg;
Is this still something necessary / useful? I think the point was to
move dsi_cfg to the state, while this is a non-state struct.
> };
>
> #endif /* !__CDNS_DSI_H__ */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry