Re: [PATCH][next] btrfs: selftests: Fix spelling mistake "suceeded" -> "succeeded"
From: Johannes Thumshirn
Date: Mon Jan 13 2025 - 06:31:26 EST
On 13.01.25 10:18, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in two test_err messages. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
> index 6c7e561e5564..6747350a05f5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int test_delete_two_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
> ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical1, &len1, map_type,
> 0, &io_stripe);
> if (ret != -ENODATA) {
> - test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] suceeded, should fail\n",
> + test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] succeeded, should fail\n",
> logical1, len1);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int test_delete_two_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
> ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical2, &len2, map_type,
> 0, &io_stripe);
> if (ret != -ENODATA) {
> - test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] suceeded, should fail\n",
> + test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] succeeded, should fail\n",
> logical2, len2);
> goto out;
> }
Oops, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>