Re: [PATCH] x86/execmem: fix ROX cache usage in Xen PV guests

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Jan 13 2025 - 12:56:30 EST


On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 02:00:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Adding the author in Fixes to Cc
>
> Thanks, Boris!
>
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 07:56:31AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > The recently introduced ROX cache for modules is assuming large page
> > > support in 64-bit mode without testing the related feature bit. This
> > > results in breakage when running as a Xen PV guest, as in this mode
> > > large pages are not supported.
>
> The ROX cache does not assume support for large pages, it just had a bug
> when dealing with base pages and the patch below should fix it.
>
> Restricting ROX cache only for configurations that support large pages
> makes sense on it's own because there's no real benefit from the cache on
> such systems, but it does not fix the issue but rather covers it up.
>
> diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c
> index be6b234c032e..0090a6f422aa 100644
> --- a/mm/execmem.c
> +++ b/mm/execmem.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int execmem_cache_populate(struct execmem_range *range, size_t size)
> unsigned long vm_flags = VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP;
> struct execmem_area *area;
> unsigned long start, end;
> + unsigned int page_shift;
> struct vm_struct *vm;
> size_t alloc_size;
> int err = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -296,8 +297,9 @@ static int execmem_cache_populate(struct execmem_range *range, size_t size)
> if (err)
> goto err_free_mem;
>
> + page_shift = get_vm_area_page_order(vm) + PAGE_SHIFT;
> err = vmap_pages_range_noflush(start, end, range->pgprot, vm->pages,
> - PMD_SHIFT);
> + page_shift);
> if (err)
> goto err_free_mem;
>
> --

So this patch is still being discussed here.

akpm has already picked up the original fix from Jürgen:

59f59108475e ("x86/execmem: fix ROX cache usage in Xen PV guests")

and the patch is already in Linus' tree.

How much of a fiasco is this execmem thing going to become?

Andrew, is there any chance we can synchronize on what you pick up for
arch/x86/ or?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette