Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule_work outside lock

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Mon Jan 13 2025 - 22:24:22 EST

Next message: Baoquan He: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Accept unaccepted kexec segments' destination addresses"
Previous message: liuye: "[PATCH] selftests/memfd/memfd_test: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference"
In reply to: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule_work outside lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:50:36AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> With this patch in linux-next, I get some unit test errors.

Thanks! This patch should fix the problem.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/Z4XWx5X0doetOJni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Next message: Baoquan He: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Accept unaccepted kexec segments' destination addresses"
Previous message: liuye: "[PATCH] selftests/memfd/memfd_test: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference"
In reply to: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule_work outside lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]