Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: fix freeing IRQ in am65_cpsw_nuss_remove_tx_chns()

From: Siddharth Vadapalli
Date: Wed Jan 15 2025 - 00:19:07 EST


On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:

Hello Roger,

> When getting the IRQ we use k3_udma_glue_rx_get_irq() which returns

You probably meant "k3_udma_glue_tx_get_irq()" instead? It is used to
assign tx_chn->irq within am65_cpsw_nuss_init_tx_chns() as follows:

tx_chn->irq = k3_udma_glue_tx_get_irq(tx_chn->tx_chn);

Additionally, following the above section we have:

if (tx_chn->irq < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to get tx dma irq %d\n",
tx_chn->irq);
ret = tx_chn->irq;
goto err;
}

Could you please provide details on the code-path which will lead to a
negative "tx_chn->irq" within "am65_cpsw_nuss_remove_tx_chns()"?

There seem to be two callers of am65_cpsw_nuss_remove_tx_chns(), namely:
1. am65_cpsw_nuss_update_tx_rx_chns()
2. am65_cpsw_nuss_suspend()
Since both of them seem to invoke am65_cpsw_nuss_remove_tx_chns() only
in the case where am65_cpsw_nuss_init_tx_chns() *did not* error out, it
appears to me that "tx_chn->irq" will never be negative within
am65_cpsw_nuss_remove_tx_chns()

Please let me know if I have overlooked something.

Regards,
Siddharth.

> negative error value on error. So not NULL check is not sufficient
> to deteremine if IRQ is valid. Check that IRQ is greater then zero
> to ensure it is valid.
>
> Fixes: 93a76530316a ("net: ethernet: ti: introduce am65x/j721e gigabit eth subsystem driver")
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> index 5465bf872734..e1de45fb18ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> @@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ static void am65_cpsw_nuss_remove_tx_chns(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
> for (i = 0; i < common->tx_ch_num; i++) {
> struct am65_cpsw_tx_chn *tx_chn = &common->tx_chns[i];
>
> - if (tx_chn->irq)
> + if (tx_chn->irq > 0)
> devm_free_irq(dev, tx_chn->irq, tx_chn);
>
> netif_napi_del(&tx_chn->napi_tx);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 5bc55a333a2f7316b58edc7573e8e893f7acb532
> change-id: 20250114-am65-cpsw-fix-tx-irq-free-846ac55ee6e1
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
>