Re: [GIT PULL] litex changes for 2025-01-01

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025, at 18:06, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thanks for applying LiteX specific patches through `soc` in the past!
> There's one patch from 2024 that seems to have fallen through the
> cracks, and part of my 2025 new year's resolution is to figure out
> how to properly act as LiteX maintainer and send proper pull requests
> up the chain, so please excuse any mistakes in the PR below :)

Hi Gabriel,

The pull request looks mostly fine, but I'd like you to resend this
one in order to improve it a little more:

- You have based on commit 56e6a3499e14 ("Merge tag 'trace-v6.13-rc5'
  of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace"),
  which is not an -rc release. Please rebase this on 6.13-rc1
  instead (the earliest -rc release for the current merge cycle
  that works as a base) in order to get a better git history

- in the subject line, drop the date and instead add the kernel
  release you want this to be merged into. In particular the
  information I want is whether the contents are meant as bugfixes
  for the current release (and possible backports) or as
  improvements that are only needed in a future release.

> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> litex patch(es) left over from 2024
>
> This is the one remaining for-upstream LiteX update from 2024 that
> has been reviewed and successfully tested against the latest Linus
> tree:
> 	- drivers/soc/litex: Use devm_register_restart_handler()

The tag description ends up in the commit log above a list
of the commits in it, so don't repeat that list here. A summary
of the branch contents is always welcome, especially if it
contains some background details, but it should not
duplicate the things that are easy to see otherwise.

      Arnd