Re: [External Email] Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] serial: sc16is7xx: Add polling mode if no IRQ pin is available

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:23 AM Andre Werner
<andre.werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 08:04:49AM +0100, Andre Werner wrote:

...

> > > V6:
> > > - Use polling mode for IRQ numbers <= 0 which encounter no valid IRQ
> > >   were found/defined.
> > > V7:
> > > - Try to improve and unify comments as requested.
> > > - Fix typo in commit message: pull -> poll
> >
> > Please, rebase your series on top of the recent Linux Next.
>
> I performed the rebase and get a single new commit to fix the merge
> conflicts. How do you expect the submission? Is it a new commit or
> should I mark it as a fixup? Shall it have new version number v8 or
> is it a full new commit series?

When you rebase you should not get _merge_ conflicts.
What is expected is that the first (DT binding) commit will be gone
from your local branch, followed by the shrunken / conflicting second
one.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko