Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: Introduce a more generic way to boost when cpu is going online

[zhenglifeng (A)]

On 2025/1/15 20:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:01 AM Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Since commit f37a4d6b4a2c ("cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on
>> SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw()") and commit 102fa9c4b439 ("cpufreq:
>> Allow drivers to advertise boost enabled"), per-policy boost flag has
>> already been set to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during
>> initialization. However, the current implementation doesn't work for all
>> cpufreq drivers and may fail in certain situation. A more generic
>> implementation is needed.
> 
> Can you please be more specific here?
> 
> What happens, why it happens and why do you think the way to go is to
> reimplement this?

I've explained this in commit log of patch 2. But if you think it is better
to palce here too, I'll do that in v2.