Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: TDX SEPT SEAMCALL retry

[Paolo Bonzini]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:53 AM Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the first, hmm, a bad thing is that though
> tdh_mem_sept_add()/tdh_mem_page_aug()/tdh_mem_sept_add() all need to handle
> TDX_OPERAND_BUSY, the one for tdh_mem_page_aug() has already been squashed
> into the MMU part 2.
>
> If you like, maybe I can extract the one for tdh_mem_page_aug() and merge it
> with 1+5.

That works for me, but if it's easier for you to merge the fixups in
the respective base patches that's okay too.

Paolo