Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] cpufreq: Fix re-boost issue after hotplugging a cpu

[Viresh Kumar]

On 17-01-25, 18:14, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> It turns out that cpuX will stay on the base frequency after performing
> these operations:
> 
> 1. boost all cpus: echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
> 
> 2. offline the cpu: echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online
> 
> 3. deboost all cpus: echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
> 
> 4. online the cpu: echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online
> 
> 5. boost all cpus again: echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
> 
> This is because max_freq_req of the policy is not updated during the online
> process, and the value of max_freq_req before the last offline is retained.
> When the CPU is boosted again, freq_qos_update_request() will do nothing
> because the old value is the same as the new one. This causes the CPU stay
> on the base frequency. Update max_freq_req  in cpufreq_online() will solve
> this problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 1a4cae54a01b..5882d7f5e3c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1475,6 +1475,10 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
>  				CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
> +	} else {
> +		ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto out_destroy_policy;
>  	}

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh