[PATCH 3/4] seccomp: remove the 'sd' argument from __secure_computing()

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Jan 20 2025 - 08:45:49 EST


After the previous changes 'sd' is always NULL.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c | 2 +-
include/linux/seccomp.h | 8 ++++----
kernel/entry/common.c | 2 +-
kernel/seccomp.c | 7 +++----
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c
index 727ed4a14545..c6997df63287 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int do_seccomp(struct pt_regs *regs)
* have already loaded -ENOSYS into r3, or seccomp has put
* something else in r3 (via SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO/TRACE).
*/
- if (__secure_computing(NULL))
+ if (__secure_computing())
return -1;

/*
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
index e01dfe57a884..6125baa96b76 100644
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -23,16 +23,16 @@
#include <asm/seccomp.h>

#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-extern int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd);
+extern int __secure_computing(void);
static inline int secure_computing(void)
{
if (unlikely(test_syscall_work(SECCOMP)))
- return __secure_computing(NULL);
+ return __secure_computing();
return 0;
}
#else
extern void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall);
-static inline int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd) { return 0; }
+static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
#endif

extern long prctl_get_seccomp(void);
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
#else
static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
#endif
-static inline int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd) { return 0; }
+static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }

static inline long prctl_get_seccomp(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
index e33691d5adf7..20154572ede9 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall,

/* Do seccomp after ptrace, to catch any tracer changes. */
if (work & SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP) {
- ret = __secure_computing(NULL);
+ ret = __secure_computing();
if (ret == -1L)
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 385d48293a5f..c29dfe82139e 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
}
#endif

-int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
+int __secure_computing(void)
{
int mode = current->seccomp.mode;
int this_syscall;
@@ -1356,15 +1356,14 @@ int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
unlikely(current->ptrace & PT_SUSPEND_SECCOMP))
return 0;

- this_syscall = sd ? sd->nr :
- syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs());
+ this_syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs());

switch (mode) {
case SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT:
__secure_computing_strict(this_syscall); /* may call do_exit */
return 0;
case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER:
- return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, sd, false);
+ return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, false);
/* Surviving SECCOMP_RET_KILL_* must be proactively impossible. */
case SECCOMP_MODE_DEAD:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55