On 20/01/2025 13:59, Benjamin Larsson wrote:
On 2025-01-20 08:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:But wasn't nuvoton placed in specific, ordered place?
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 02:01:04PM +0100, Benjamin Larsson wrote:Hi, I placed it after nuvoton that was the most recent addition to the
The Airoha SoC family have a mostly 16550-compatible UARTI assume you placed it matching existing order (kind of alphabetical for
and High-Speed UART hardware with the exception of custom
baud rate settings register.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Larsson <benjamin.larsson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml
index 692aa05500fd..2fbb972e5460 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ properties:
- const: mrvl,pxa-uart
- const: nuvoton,wpcm450-uart
- const: nuvoton,npcm750-uart
+ - const: airoha,airoha-uart
+ - const: airoha,airoha-hsuart
compatibles with vendors)?
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
serial8250_config uart_config[] table that was also added to the
8250.yaml binding. IIRC I noted that there was no clear order in theEntries with vendor look to me fully ordered by name.
binding list. So the placement could be considered as random. If another
place is better I can move it for the next version of the patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof