Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Add Microchip IPC mailbox
From: Jassi Brar
Date: Mon Jan 20 2025 - 11:19:52 EST
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:20 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jassi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:31:30AM +0000, Valentina Fernandez wrote:
> ...
> > This series adds support for the Microchip Inter-Processor Communication
> > (IPC) mailbox driver.
> ...
> > Valentina Fernandez (4):
> > riscv: sbi: vendorid_list: Add Microchip Technology to the vendor list
> > riscv: export __cpuid_to_hartid_map
> > dt-bindings: mailbox: add binding for Microchip IPC mailbox controller
> > mailbox: add Microchip IPC support
>
> I see this series is now in next-20250120 but you only applied patches 3
> and 4, so the build is broken:
>
> In file included from drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:22:
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c: In function 'mchp_ipc_sbi_chan_send':
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:29:42: error: 'MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 29 | MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h:436:56: note: in definition of macro 'sbi_ecall'
> 436 | __sbi_ecall(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, f, e)
> | ^
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:121:25: note: in expansion of macro 'SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY'
> 121 | ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY, command, channel,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:29:42: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 29 | MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h:436:56: note: in definition of macro 'sbi_ecall'
> 436 | __sbi_ecall(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, f, e)
> | ^
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:121:25: note: in expansion of macro 'SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY'
> 121 | ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY, command, channel,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c: In function 'mchp_ipc_sbi_send':
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:29:42: error: 'MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 29 | MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h:436:56: note: in definition of macro 'sbi_ecall'
> 436 | __sbi_ecall(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, f, e)
> | ^
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:134:25: note: in expansion of macro 'SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY'
> 134 | ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY, command, address,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c: In function 'mchp_ipc_probe':
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:29:42: error: 'MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 29 | MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mchp-ipc-sbi.c:420:35: note: in expansion of macro 'SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY'
> 420 | ret = sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_MICROCHIP_TECHNOLOGY);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Can you please fix this? It is a little frustrating this is happening
> just as the merge window opens...
>
Usually the platform specific stuff goes via the platform tree, for
example there isn't anything 'mailbox' about MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID and
__cpuid_to_hartid_map.
I pick only mailbox patches unless the maintainer acks and wants me to
pick platform ones. Though I should have noted that I am picking only
mailbox stuff, but ok I will queue them now.
Thnx