Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Fix the wrong reading of register fields

[Jiwei Sun]

On 1/22/25 20:53, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> The macro PCIE_LNKCTL2_TLS2SPEED() and PCIE_LNKCAP_SLS2SPEED() just use
>> the link speed field of the registers. However, there are many other
>> different function fields in the Link Control 2 Register or the Link
>> Capabilities Register. If the register value is directly used by the two
>> macros, it may cause getting an error link speed value (PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN).
> 
>  The change proposed seems right to me, however...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> index 2e40fc63ba31..c571f5943f3d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> @@ -337,12 +337,14 @@ void pci_bus_put(struct pci_bus *bus);
>>  
>>  #define PCIE_LNKCAP_SLS2SPEED(lnkcap)					\
>>  ({									\
>> -	((lnkcap) == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_64_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_64_0GT :	\
>> -	 (lnkcap) == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_32_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_32_0GT :	\
>> -	 (lnkcap) == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_16_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_16_0GT :	\
>> -	 (lnkcap) == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_8_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_8_0GT :	\
>> -	 (lnkcap) == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_5_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT :	\
>> -	 (lnkcap) == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB ? PCIE_SPEED_2_5GT :	\
>> +	u32 __lnkcap = (lnkcap) & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;			\
>> +									\
>> +	(__lnkcap == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_64_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_64_0GT :	\
>> +	 __lnkcap == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_32_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_32_0GT :	\
>> +	 __lnkcap == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_16_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_16_0GT :	\
>> +	 __lnkcap == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_8_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_8_0GT :	\
>> +	 __lnkcap == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_5_0GB ? PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT :	\
>> +	 __lnkcap == PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB ? PCIE_SPEED_2_5GT :	\
> 
>  ... wouldn't it make sense to give the intermediate variable a meaningful 
> name reflecting data it carries, e.g. `lnkcap_sls'?

This is a good idea. I will modify the patch in the v4 patch.

Thanks,
Regards,
Jiwei