Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: Explicitly handle compat ioctls

[Thomas Weißschuh]

On 2025-01-22 18:15:13+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A simpler variant of the patch would move the switch/case logic
> into posix_clock_compat_ioctl() and avoid the extra function
> pointer, simply calling posix_clock_ioctl() with the modified
> argument.

That would work, but be a layering violation.
Or a "compat_mode" argument to ptp_ioctl()

I'm fine with either approach.


Thomas