Re: [PATCH] vbox: add HAS_IOPORT dependency

From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Thu Jan 23 2025 - 13:55:52 EST

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH v5] sysctl: simplify the min/max boundary check"
Previous message: Liang, Kan: "Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/bts: allocate bts_ctx only if necessary"
In reply to: Hans de Goede: "Re: [PATCH] vbox: add HAS_IOPORT dependency"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> Most arm64 platforms don't actually support port I/O, though it is
> currently enabled unconditionally. Refine the vbox dependency to allow
> turning it HAS_IOPORT off in the future when building for platforms
^^
Leftover from an in-progress version of the text?

Maciej

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH v5] sysctl: simplify the min/max boundary check"
Previous message: Liang, Kan: "Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/bts: allocate bts_ctx only if necessary"
In reply to: Hans de Goede: "Re: [PATCH] vbox: add HAS_IOPORT dependency"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]