Re: [PATCH 1/7] zram: switch to non-atomic entry locking

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (25/01/24 20:03), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (25/01/24 18:30), Hillf Danton wrote:
> > On (25/01/22 14:57), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > 
> > > -	for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++)
> > > -		spin_lock_init(&zram->table[index].lock);
> > > +	for (index = 0; index < num_ents; index++)
> > > +		init_rwsem(&zram->locks[index].lock);
> > 
> > Curious if lockdep trick [1] is needed here.
> 
> These bucket locks are not part of the v2 which I'm currnetly
> working on.

v2 will also come with a draft version of new zsmalloc API that does
not impose atomicity restrictions in zs_map_object() (no local CPU
lock and no migration rwlock involved.)