Re: [PATCH] landlock: fix grammar and spelling error

[Tanya Agarwal]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 5:06 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:12:10AM +0530, Tanya Agarwal wrote:
> > From: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Fix grammar and spelling error in landlock module comments that were
> > identified using the codespell tool.
> > No functional changes - documentation only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think Mimi's tag was for the IMA part, so I'll remove it.
>
> > ---
> > Original discussion:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250112072925.1774-1-tanyaagarwal25699@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > This patch set is split into individual patches for each LSM
> > to facilitate easier review by respective maintainers.
> >
> >  security/landlock/ruleset.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> > index a93bdbf52fff..c464d1f84792 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> > +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ create_rule(const struct landlock_id id,
> >               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >       RB_CLEAR_NODE(&new_rule->node);
> >       if (is_object_pointer(id.type)) {
> > -             /* This should be catched by insert_rule(). */
> > +             /* This should have been caught by insert_rule(). */
> >               WARN_ON_ONCE(!id.key.object);
> >               landlock_get_object(id.key.object);
> >       }
>
> Thanks, I'll take it in my tree.

Thanks Mickael.

Regards,
Tanya