Re: [PATCH v4 05/39] x86/asm: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 05:08:57PM +0100, Jens Remus wrote:
> On 22.01.2025 03:30, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > -#ifndef BUILD_VDSO
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Emit CFI data in .debug_frame sections, not .eh_frame sections.
> > -	 * The latter we currently just discard since we don't do DWARF
> > -	 * unwinding at runtime.  So only the offline DWARF information is
> > -	 * useful to anyone.  Note we should not use this directive if we
> > -	 * ever decide to enable DWARF unwinding at runtime.
> > -	 */
> > -	.cfi_sections .debug_frame
> > -#else
> > -	 /*
> > -	  * For the vDSO, emit both runtime unwind information and debug
> > -	  * symbols for the .dbg file.
> > -	  */
> > -	.cfi_sections .eh_frame, .debug_frame
> > -#endif
> > +#else /* !BUILD_VDSO */
> > +
> 
> Did you remove ".cfi_sections .debug_frame" on purpose from the
> !BUILD_VDSO path compared to V3?

Yes, since non-VDSO assembly files won't be emitting any .cfi, there's
no .debug_frame to output anyway.

> Presumably to not only not emit DWARF CFI from assembler, but any
> source?

This only impacts assembly files, notice the __ASSEMBLY__ check at the
top of the file.

-- 
Josh