Re: [PATCH V3] mm: compaction: use the actual allocation context to determine the watermarks for costly order during async memory compaction

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Sat Jan 25 2025 - 01:27:32 EST

Next message: Stafford Horne: "[GIT PULL] OpenRISC updates for 6.14"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): Add support for adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800"
In reply to: yangge1116: "[PATCH V3] mm: compaction: use the actual allocation context to determine the watermarks for costly order during async memory compaction"
Next in thread: Ge Yang: "Re: [PATCH V3] mm: compaction: use the actual allocation context to determine the watermarks for costly order during async memory compaction"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 02:19:47PM +0800, yangge1116@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: yangge <yangge1116@xxxxxxx>

Your subject line is far too long. Please try to keep it below 50
characters. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
and search for 'Subject Line'.

Next message: Stafford Horne: "[GIT PULL] OpenRISC updates for 6.14"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): Add support for adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800"
In reply to: yangge1116: "[PATCH V3] mm: compaction: use the actual allocation context to determine the watermarks for costly order during async memory compaction"
Next in thread: Ge Yang: "Re: [PATCH V3] mm: compaction: use the actual allocation context to determine the watermarks for costly order during async memory compaction"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]