Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] perf/dwc_pcie: fix duplicate pci_dev devices
From: yunhui cui
Date: Sat Jan 25 2025 - 20:54:56 EST
Hi Will,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:30 PM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 05:11:05PM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
> > > >>> vsec = dwc_pcie_des_cap(pdev);
> > > >>> if (!vsec)
> > > >>> return -ENODEV;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> sbdf = plat_dev->id;
> > > >>> - name = devm_kasprintf(&plat_dev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "dwc_rootport_%x", sbdf);
> > > >>> + name = devm_kasprintf(&plat_dev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "dwc_rootport_%d_pmu", sbdf);
> > > >>
> > > >> A new name will break previous user tools.
> > > > This name isn't suitable. It can't clearly show which is the PMU
> > > > device. Userspace tools don't have binding relationships, like perf.
> > > > Tools must traverse PMU devices before use.
> > >
> > > The device is under /sys/bus/event_source/ which indates it is PMU device.
> > > As far as I know, most of PMU devices do not endup with a '_pmu' prefix.
> >
> > The point is the name "dwc_rootport_" is misleading, suggesting an
> > extra PCIE RP in the system. Best to change the name to intuitive
> > "xx_pmu".
>
> As pointed out above, changing the name will break userspace. So it's
> simply not an option, sorry.
Could you specify what in the userspace is broken and give an example?
>
> Will
Thanks,
Yunhui