Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: psci: Add trace for PSCI domain idle

[Keita Morisaki]

> > Yes, psci_domain_idle_(enter|exit) are not meant to replace cpu_idle nor a
> > variant of it. It's new and different events that provide finer=grained info.

> I mentioned it because it means it doesn't benefit from cpu_idle tooling
> directly, which is slightly odd, but fine with me.

I might not fully understand your comments.
Do you mean that even mentioning cpu_idle in the commit message does not feel
right to you, or utilizing cpu_idle by exposing the determined state instead of
adding new trace events is the right direction?