Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: spi: Add STM32 OSPI controller

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Wed Jan 29 2025 - 12:57:08 EST


On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:40:23PM +0100, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> On 1/28/25 19:02, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 09:17:23AM +0100, patrice.chotard@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> + memory-region:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >
> > Whatever about not having descriptions for clocks or reg when there's
> > only one, I think a memory region should be explained.
>
> ok i will add :
>
> description: |

The | isn't needed here.

> Memory region to be used for memory-map read access.

I don't think that's a good explanation, sorry. Why's a memory-region
required for read access?

> >> +
> >> + clocks:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + interrupts:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + resets:
> >> + items:
> >> + - description: phandle to OSPI block reset
> >> + - description: phandle to delay block reset
> >> +
> >> + dmas:
> >> + maxItems: 2
> >> +
> >> + dma-names:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: tx
> >> + - const: rx
> >> +
> >> + st,syscfg-dlyb:
> >> + description: phandle to syscon block
> >> + Use to set the OSPI delay block within syscon to
> >> + tune the phase of the RX sampling clock (or DQS) in order
> >> + to sample the data in their valid window and to
> >> + tune the phase of the TX launch clock in order to meet setup
> >> + and hold constraints of TX signals versus the memory clock.
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> >
> > Why do you need a phandle here? I assume looking up by compatible ain't
> > possible because you have multiple controllers on the SoC? Also, I don't
>
> Yes, we got 2 OCTOSPI controller, each of them have a dedicated delay block
> syscfg register.

:+1:

> > think your copy-paste "phandle to" stuff here is accurate:
> > st,syscfg-dlyb = <&syscfg 0x1000>;
> > There's an offset here that you don't mention in your description.
>
> I will add it as following:
>
> st,syscfg-dlyb:
> description:
> Use to set the OSPI delay block within syscon to
> tune the phase of the RX sampling clock (or DQS) in order
> to sample the data in their valid window and to
> tune the phase of the TX launch clock in order to meet setup
> and hold constraints of TX signals versus the memory clock.
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> items:
> - description: phandle to syscfg
> - description: register offset within syscfg

:+1:

> >> + access-controllers:
> >> + description: phandle to the rifsc device to check access right
> >> + and in some cases, an additional phandle to the rcc device for
> >> + secure clock control
> >
> > This should be described using items rather than a free-form list.
>
> access-controllers:
> description: phandle to the rifsc device to check access right
> and in some cases, an additional phandle to the rcc device for
> secure clock control
> items:
> - description: phandle to bus controller or to clock controller
> - description: access controller specifier
> minItems: 1
> maxItems: 2

These updates look fine to me.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature