On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 03:26:16PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
Hello,
On 25. 1. 28. 05:05, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 07:16:11PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
...
has_tasks:
+ if (scx_rq_bypassing(rq))
+ __scx_add_event(BYPASS_DISPATCH, 1);
Can we do this at the sources even if that's a bit more code?
Sure. I will remove scx_add_event() and __scx_add_event() and will use
this_cpu_add() and __this_cpu_add() directly.
Oh, that's not what I meant. I meant that in the code quoted above, the stat
is being incremented in a spot where most code paths converge and then the
specific stat condition is being tested again. It'd be better to update the
stat where the condition is detected initially.