RE: (subset) [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700

[Ryan Chen]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2024 12:12 AM
> To: lee@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; joel@xxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx; Ryan Chen
> <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for
> AST2700
> 
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:01:51 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > Add reset, clk dt bindings headers, and update compatible support for
> > AST2700 clk, silicon-id in yaml.
> >
> >
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700
>       commit: 76c6217c31266e800b67a476bba59dfeb9858a90
> 
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Hello,
Since this patch have been applied, if I still want modify I will do the rebase and still patch base on this.
Am I right?

For example I want to modify include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-scu.h
I send the patchv8 [1/3] patch for aspeed,ast2700-scu.h
Others [2/3], [3/3] still progress, am I right?

Or I should go for new patch series?

Ryan