Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review

[Muhammad Usama Anjum]

On 1/30/25 7:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
OVERVIEW

        Builds: 29 passed, 0 failed

    Boot tests: 667 passed, 2 failed

    CI systems: maestro

REVISION

    Commit
        name: v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5
        hash: 4d14e2486de5514e8267e9061685a372056a2b94
    Checked out from
        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y


BUILDS

    No build failures found

BOOT TESTS

    Failures
      arm64:(defconfig)
      -mt8195-cherry-tomato-r2
	https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/test/test?var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=$__all&var-build_architecture=$__all&var-build_config_name=$__all&var-id=maestro:679ba54865fae3351e318fd9&from=now-100y&to=now&timezone=browser&var-test_path=&var-issue_presence=$__all
	https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/test/test?var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=$__all&var-build_architecture=$__all&var-build_config_name=$__all&var-id=maestro:679baad565fae3351e31b376&from=now-100y&to=now&timezone=browser&var-test_path=&var-issue_presence=$__all
      CI system: maestro

See complete and up-to-date report at:

    https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=4d14e2486de5514e8267e9061685a372056a2b94&var-patchset_hash=


Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
KernelCI team