[PATCH v3 3/6] exit: postpone tty_kref_put() until after tasklist_lock is dropped

From: Mateusz Guzik
Date: Sat Feb 01 2025 - 11:32:03 EST


Instead of smuggling the tty pointer directly, use a struct so that more
things can be added later.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/exit.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 257dd8ed45ea..d2c74f93f7d2 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ static __init int kernel_exit_sysfs_init(void)
late_initcall(kernel_exit_sysfs_init);
#endif

+/*
+ * For things release_task() would like to do *after* tasklist_lock is released.
+ */
+struct release_task_post {
+ struct tty_struct *tty;
+};
+
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
{
nr_threads--;
@@ -141,12 +148,11 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
/*
* This function expects the tasklist_lock write-locked.
*/
-static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static void __exit_signal(struct release_task_post *post, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal;
bool group_dead = thread_group_leader(tsk);
struct sighand_struct *sighand;
- struct tty_struct *tty;
u64 utime, stime;

sighand = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->sighand,
@@ -160,7 +166,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
#endif

if (group_dead) {
- tty = sig->tty;
+ post->tty = sig->tty;
sig->tty = NULL;
} else {
/*
@@ -207,10 +213,8 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)

__cleanup_sighand(sighand);
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SIGPENDING);
- if (group_dead) {
+ if (group_dead)
flush_sigqueue(&sig->shared_pending);
- tty_kref_put(tty);
- }
}

static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp)
@@ -236,10 +240,13 @@ void __weak release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)

void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ struct release_task_post post;
struct task_struct *leader;
struct pid *thread_pid;
int zap_leader;
repeat:
+ memset(&post, 0, sizeof(post));
+
/* don't need to get the RCU readlock here - the process is dead and
* can't be modifying its own credentials. But shut RCU-lockdep up */
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -252,7 +259,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)

write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
ptrace_release_task(p);
- __exit_signal(p);
+ __exit_signal(&post, p);

/*
* If we are the last non-leader member of the thread
@@ -280,6 +287,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
sizeof(unsigned long long));
release_thread(p);
put_task_struct_rcu_user(p);
+ tty_kref_put(post.tty);

p = leader;
if (unlikely(zap_leader))
--
2.43.0