Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/17] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add bindings for RISC-V RPMI system MSI

From: Rob Herring
Date: Mon Feb 03 2025 - 17:58:55 EST


On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 02:18:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the system MSI service group based interrupt
> controller defined by the RISC-V platform management interface (RPMI)
> specification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../riscv,rpmi-system-msi.yaml | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,rpmi-system-msi.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,rpmi-system-msi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,rpmi-system-msi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e6c297e66c99
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,rpmi-system-msi.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/riscv,rpmi-system-msi.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: RISC-V RPMI system MSI service group based interrupt controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> + The RISC-V Platform Management Interface (RPMI) [1] defines a
> + messaging protocol which is modular and extensible. The supervisor
> + software can send/receive RPMI messages via SBI MPXY extension [2]
> + or some dedicated supervisor-mode RPMI transport.
> +
> + The RPMI specification [1] defines system MSI service group which
> + allow application processors to receive MSIs upon system events
> + such as P2A doorbell, graceful shutdown/reboot request, CPU hotplug
> + event, memory hotplug event, etc from the platform microcontroller.

I'm confused by this description and what the binding has. This "device"
is receiving interrupts and generating MSIs based on those interrupts?

> +
> + ===========================================
> + References
> + ===========================================
> +
> + [1] RISC-V Platform Management Interface (RPMI)
> + https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-rpmi/releases
> +
> + [2] RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> + https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/releases
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - description:
> + Intended for use by the SBI implementation in machine mode or
> + software in supervisor mode.
> + const: riscv,rpmi-system-msi
> +
> + - description:
> + Intended for use by the SBI implementation in machine mode.
> + const: riscv,rpmi-mpxy-system-msi
> +
> + mboxes:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + Mailbox channel of the underlying RPMI transport or SBI message proxy.
> +
> + riscv,sbi-mpxy-channel-id:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + description:
> + The SBI MPXY channel id to be used for providing RPMI access to
> + the supervisor software. This property is mandatory when using
> + riscv,rpmi-mpxy-system-msi compatible string.
> +
> + msi-parent: true
> +
> + interrupt-controller: true
> +
> + "#interrupt-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - mboxes
> + - msi-parent
> + - interrupt-controller
> + - "#interrupt-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + mpxy_mbox: sbi-mpxy-mbox {

mailbox {

Though generally we don't show providers for a consumer schema.

> + compatible = "riscv,sbi-mpxy-mbox";
> + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> + };
> + rpmi_sysmsi_intc: interrupt-controller {
> + compatible = "riscv,rpmi-system-msi";
> + mboxes = <&mpxy_mbox 0x2000 0x0>;
> + msi-parent = <&imsic_slevel>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +...
> --
> 2.43.0
>