Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/7] stmmac: intel: configure SerDes according to the interface mode
From: Simon Horman
Date: Tue Feb 04 2025 - 13:14:10 EST
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:10:17PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
> Intel platform will configure the SerDes through PMC api based on the
> provided interface mode.
>
> This patch adds several new functions below:-
> - intel_tsn_lane_is_available(): This new function reads FIA lane
> ownership registers and common lane registers through IPC commands
> to know which lane the mGbE port is assigned to.
> - intel_config_serdes(): To configure the SerDes based on the assigned
> lane and latest interface mode, it sends IPC command to the PMC through
> PMC driver/API. The PMC acts as a proxy for R/W on behalf of the driver.
> - intel_set_reg_access(): Set the register access to the available TSN
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> +static int intel_config_serdes(struct net_device *ndev,
> + void *intel_data,
> + phy_interface_t interface)
> +{
> + struct intel_priv_data *intel_priv = intel_data;
> + struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!intel_tsn_lane_is_available(ndev, intel_priv)) {
> + netdev_info(priv->dev,
> + "No TSN lane available to set the registers.\n");
> + goto pmc_read_error;
> + }
> +
> + if (intel_priv->pid_modphy == PID_MODPHY1) {
> + if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX) {
> + ret = intel_set_reg_access(pid_modphy1_2p5g_regs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(pid_modphy1_2p5g_regs));
> + } else {
> + ret = intel_set_reg_access(pid_modphy1_1g_regs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(pid_modphy1_1g_regs));
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX) {
> + ret = intel_set_reg_access(pid_modphy3_2p5g_regs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(pid_modphy3_2p5g_regs));
> + } else {
> + ret = intel_set_reg_access(pid_modphy3_1g_regs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(pid_modphy3_1g_regs));
> + }
> + }
> +
> + priv->plat->phy_interface = interface;
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto pmc_read_error;
Perhaps this is an artifact of earlier refactoring,
but the condition above seems to be without meaning
as in either case the code goes directly to pmc_read_error.
> +
> +pmc_read_error:
> + intel_serdes_powerdown(ndev, intel_priv);
> + intel_serdes_powerup(ndev, intel_priv);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void common_default_data(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
> {
> plat->clk_csr = 2; /* clk_csr_i = 20-35MHz & MDC = clk_csr_i/16 */
...