Re: [PATCH 0/2] tools: Unify top-level quiet infrastructure

[Namhyung Kim]

Hello,

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:34:41AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 05:18:42PM +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 12:10 AM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The quiet infrastructure was moved out of Makefile.build to accomidate
> > > the new syscall table generation scripts in perf. Syscall table
> > > generation wanted to also be able to be quiet, so instead of again
> > > copying the code to set the quiet variables, the code was moved into
> > > Makefile.perf to be used globally. This was not the right solution. It
> > > should have been moved even further upwards in the call chain.
> > > Makefile.include is imported in many files so this seems like a proper
> > > place to put it.
> > >
> > > To:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Charlie Jenkins (2):
> > >       tools: Unify top-level quiet infrastructure
> > >       tools: Remove redundant quiet setup
> > >
> > >  tools/arch/arm64/tools/Makefile           |  6 -----
> > >  tools/bpf/Makefile                        |  6 -----
> > >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/Makefile  |  6 -----
> > >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                |  6 -----
> > >  tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile         |  2 --
> > >  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile             |  5 +---
> > >  tools/build/Makefile                      |  8 +-----
> > >  tools/lib/bpf/Makefile                    | 13 ----------
> > 
> > Nack.
> > libbpf and bpftool are synced independently to github
> > and released from there.
> > This change breaks it.

Sorry, I overlooked this part and merged a change that touched the
common files into the perf tree.

f2868b1a66d4f40f ("perf tools: Expose quiet/verbose variables in Makefile.perf")

Unfortunately, it's already in v6.14-rc1.

> 
> Can you explain how it breaks it? Currently bpftool and resolve_btfids
> don't build quietly so this was an attempt to fix that.

So I think you will need something like this for v6.14.  Again, sorry
about the trouble.

Thanks,
Namhyung