Re: [PATCH 1/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: fix MPLL_MULTIPLIER and SSC_REFCLKSEL masks in refclk

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:10:12AM +0530, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> In exynos5_usbdrd_{pipe3,utmi}_set_refclk(), the masks
> PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK and PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK are not
> inverted when applied to the register values. Fix it.
> 
> Fixes: 59025887fb08 ("phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver")

Missing Cc-stable and this should be sent separately.

> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> index c421b495eb0fe4396d76f8c9d7c198ad7cd08869..4a108fdab118c0edd76bd88dc9dbf6a498e064b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> @@ -488,9 +488,9 @@ exynos5_usbdrd_pipe3_set_refclk(struct phy_usb_instance *inst)
>  	reg |=	PHYCLKRST_REFCLKSEL_EXT_REFCLK;
>  
>  	/* FSEL settings corresponding to reference clock */
> -	reg &= ~PHYCLKRST_FSEL_PIPE_MASK |
> -		PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK |
> -		PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK;
> +	reg &= ~(PHYCLKRST_FSEL_PIPE_MASK |
> +		 PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK |
> +		 PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK);
>  	switch (phy_drd->extrefclk) {
>  	case EXYNOS5_FSEL_50MHZ:
>  		reg |= (PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_50M_REF |
> @@ -532,9 +532,9 @@ exynos5_usbdrd_utmi_set_refclk(struct phy_usb_instance *inst)
>  	reg &= ~PHYCLKRST_REFCLKSEL_MASK;
>  	reg |=	PHYCLKRST_REFCLKSEL_EXT_REFCLK;
>  
> -	reg &= ~PHYCLKRST_FSEL_UTMI_MASK |
> -		PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK |
> -		PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK;
> +	reg &= ~(PHYCLKRST_FSEL_UTMI_MASK |
> +		 PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK |
> +		 PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK);
>  	reg |= PHYCLKRST_FSEL(phy_drd->extrefclk);

This part does not set MPLL_MULTIPLIER and SSC_REFCLKSEL fields later,
but I also assume intention was to clear the fields.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Krzysztof