Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with Linus' tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 09:38:23AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   fs/dcache.c
>   fs/erofs/zdata.c
>   fs/gfs2/quota.c
>   include/linux/lockref.h
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   4b193fa75eff ("lockref: remove lockref_put_not_zero")
>   6d2868d5b6fc ("lockref: use bool for false/true returns")
>   25d8060418b4 ("lockref: drop superfluous externs")
>   63440d1c6dd1 ("lockref: add a lockref_init helper")
>   8c32b87c4f88 ("dcache: use lockref_init for d_lockref")
>   6f86f1465b59 ("erofs: use lockref_init for pcl->lockref")
>   3e652eba244c ("gfs2: use lockref_init for qd_lockref")
> 
> from Linus' tree (plus further commits affecting these same files in other
> trees) and commits:
> 
>   74b5da771c89 ("lockref: remove lockref_put_not_zero")
>   57bd981b2db7 ("lockref: use bool for false/true returns")
>   80e2823cbe59 ("lockref: drop superfluous externs")
>   5f0c395edf59 ("lockref: add a lockref_init helper")
>   24706068b7b6 ("dcache: use lockref_init for d_lockref")
>   160a93170d53 ("erofs: use lockref_init for pcl->lockref")
>   0ef3858b15e3 ("gfs2: use lockref_init for qd_lockref")
> 
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (these commits are just duplicates, so I used the former
> vresions of these files) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now
> fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts
> should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is
> submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with
> the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> Please clean up the vfs-brauner tree.

Done and new tree pushed.

Thanks!
Christian