Re: [PATCH net v3] net: fec: Refactor MAC reset to function

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 14:53:50 +0100 Csókás Bence wrote:
> On 2025. 02. 04. 16:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>  > Please don't post new versions in-reply-to, and add lore links to
>  > the previous version in the changelog.  
> 
> Will do. Is it okay to only include the last version, or should I 
> collect them going back to v1?

All.

> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 10:37:54 +0100 Csókás, Bence wrote:  
> >> For instance, as of now, `fec_stop()` does not check for
> >> `FEC_QUIRK_NO_HARD_RESET`, meaning the MII/RMII mode is cleared on eg.
> >> a PM power-down event; and `fec_restart()` missed the refactor renaming
> >> the "magic" constant `1` to `FEC_ECR_RESET`.  
> > 
> > Laurent responded to v1 saying this was intentional. Please give more
> > details on what problem you're seeing and on what platforms. Otherwise
> > this is not a fix but refactoring.  
> 
> True, but he also said:
> On 2025. 01. 21. 17:09, Badel, Laurent wrote:
>  > If others disagree and there's a consensus that this change is ok,   
> I'm happy
>  > for the patch to get through, but I tend to err on the side of   
> caution in such
>  > cases.  
> 
> I understand he is cautious, but I'd argue that the fact that two people 
> already posted Reviewed-by: (not counting Simon, who since withdrew it), 
> means that others also agree that we should err on the OTHER side of 
> caution, and do the check in both cases. He also mentions that the 
> reason he didn't do the check in `fec_stop()` was that he believed that 
> the only time that gets called is on driver/interface remove, but that 
> is not the case, as I outlined in the message already.

That's a bit of a he said, she said. Either you're see a problem 
and you can describe clearly the behavior you see, and on what
platform. Or you're just improving the code speculatively, and 
it's not a fix. The patch as is would end up in stable.

To be clear, nobody is against the patch itself, the question is
whether its a fix or refactoring.