On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11: 25: 39PM +0530, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > On 1/23/2025 10: 55 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > XDP program could have changed the packet length, but driver seems to be > > This will be true given, emac->xdp_prog
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source of this email and know the content is safe.
Report Suspicious
<https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK! v9dnXdhkNoe0hkqlFZKoUhMAqXZwolk5zXhypw1qeZY8pxUHTuuleZBOKulyBnK9eA$>
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:25:39PM +0530, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
On 1/23/2025 10:55 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> XDP program could have changed the packet length, but driver seems to be
This will be true given, emac->xdp_prog is not NULL. What about when XDP is
not enabled ?
I don't understand the question. My point is that the packet doesn't
necessarily look the same after XDP ran.
> building the skb using original length read from the descriptor.
> Consider using xdp_build_skb_from_buff()
>