Re: [PATCH RFC 03/33] locking: Introduce <linux/thread_safety.h>

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Fri Feb 07 2025 - 18:51:13 EST

Next message: Deepak Gupta: "Re: [PATCH v9 01/26] mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow stack vma"
Previous message: Alexei Starovoitov: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] btf: Add the option to include global variable types"
In reply to: Marco Elver: "Re: [PATCH RFC 03/33] locking: Introduce <linux/thread_safety.h>"
Next in thread: Bart Van Assche: "[PATCH RFC 07/33] driver core: Annotate locking functions in <linux/device.h>"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2/7/25 3:19 PM, Marco Elver wrote:

This is not a problem as I have demonstrated with my approach.

That's not what my email is about. My email is about whether or not to
continue supporting the sparse locking context annotations.

Bart.

Next message: Deepak Gupta: "Re: [PATCH v9 01/26] mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow stack vma"
Previous message: Alexei Starovoitov: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] btf: Add the option to include global variable types"
In reply to: Marco Elver: "Re: [PATCH RFC 03/33] locking: Introduce <linux/thread_safety.h>"
Next in thread: Bart Van Assche: "[PATCH RFC 07/33] driver core: Annotate locking functions in <linux/device.h>"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]