Re: [PATCH v10 1/8] sched/core: Add __might_sleep_precision()
From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Fri Feb 07 2025 - 22:01:29 EST
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:12:58 +0000
David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> static void print_preempt_disable_ip(int preempt_offset, unsigned long ip)
>> {
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT))
>> @@ -8717,7 +8699,8 @@ static inline bool resched_offsets_ok(unsigned int offsets)
>> return nested == offsets;
>> }
>>
>> -void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets)
>> +static void __might_resched_precision(const char *file, int len, int line,
>
> For clarity that ought to be file_len.
Yeah, I'll update.
>> + unsigned int offsets)
>> {
>> /* Ratelimiting timestamp: */
>> static unsigned long prev_jiffy;
>> @@ -8740,8 +8723,10 @@ void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets)
>> /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it: */
>> preempt_disable_ip = get_preempt_disable_ip(current);
>>
>> - pr_err("BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at %s:%d\n",
>> - file, line);
>> + if (len < 0)
>> + len = strlen(file);
>
> No need for strlen(), just use a big number instead of -1.
> Anything bigger than a sane upper limit on the filename length will do.
Ah, that's right. Just passing the maximum precision (1<<15-1) works.
The precision specifies the maximum length. vsnprintf() always
iterates through a string until it reaches the maximum length or
encounters the null terminator. So strlen() here is useless.
Alice and Boqun, the above change is fine? Can I keep the tags?