Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked

From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Fri Feb 07 2025 - 22:38:13 EST


On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:35 AM Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch adds filter for scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked.
>
> The kfuncs in the scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked set can be used in init, exit,
> cpu_online, cpu_offline, init_task, dump, cgroup_init, cgroup_exit,
> cgroup_prep_move, cgroup_cancel_move, cgroup_move, cgroup_set_weight
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 7f039a32f137..955fb0f5fc5e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -7079,9 +7079,39 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq, KF_RCU)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dispatch_vtime_from_dsq, KF_RCU)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked)
>
> +static int scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
> +{
> + u32 moff;
> +
> + if (!btf_id_set8_contains(&scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked, kfunc_id) ||
> + prog->aux->st_ops != &bpf_sched_ext_ops)
> + return 0;
> +
> + moff = prog->aux->attach_st_ops_member_off;
> + if (moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, init) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, exit) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cpu_online) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cpu_offline) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, init_task) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, dump))
> + return 0;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED
> + if (moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_init) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_exit) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_prep_move) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_cancel_move) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_move) ||
> + moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_set_weight))
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> + return -EACCES;
> +}
> +
> static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_unlocked = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .set = &scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked,
> + .filter = scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked_filter,
> };

why does sched-ext use so many id_set-s ?

if ((ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS,
&scx_kfunc_set_select_cpu)) ||
(ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS,

&scx_kfunc_set_enqueue_dispatch)) ||
(ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS,
&scx_kfunc_set_dispatch)) ||
(ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS,
&scx_kfunc_set_cpu_release)) ||
(ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS,
&scx_kfunc_set_unlocked)) ||

Can they all be rolled into one id_set then
the patches 2-6 will be collapsed into one patch and
one filter callback that will describe allowed hook/kfunc combinations?