Re: [PATCH] prandom: remove next_pseudo_random32

[Andi Shyti]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey Markus,
> 
> Thanks for this. I hadn't realized that next_pseudo_random32() only
> had two users left. Excellent.
> 
> I'll queue this up in the random tree (unless there are objections
> from the maintainers of that test code).

actually would be better if we apply the i915 part in drm-tip
rather than waiting for kernel releases to receive this change in
our branch. It has been source of conflicts and headaches.

May I ask Markus to split the patch in two parts and we handle
the i915 side?

Thanks,
Andi