[PATCH v2 04/17] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the movsl alignment preference for extended Families

From: Sohil Mehta
Date: Tue Feb 11 2025 - 14:47:23 EST


The alignment preference for 32-bit movsl based bulk memory move has
been 8-byte for a long time. However this preference is only set for
Family 6 and 15 processors.

Extend the preference to upcoming Family numbers 18 and 19 to maintain
legacy behavior. Also, use a VFM based check instead of switching based
on Family numbers. Refresh the comment to reflect the new check.

Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@xxxxxxxxx>

---

v2: Split the patch into two parts. Update commit message.

---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 19 ++++++-------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 3dce22f00dc3..e5f34a90963e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -449,23 +449,16 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
(c->x86_stepping < 0x6 || c->x86_stepping == 0xb))
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_11AP);

-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
/*
- * Set up the preferred alignment for movsl bulk memory moves
+ * movsl bulk memory moves can be slow when source and dest are not
+ * both 8-byte aligned. PII/PIII only like movsl with 8-byte alignment.
+ *
+ * Set the preferred alignment for Pentium Pro and newer processors, as
+ * it has only been tested on these.
*/
- switch (c->x86) {
- case 4: /* 486: untested */
- break;
- case 5: /* Old Pentia: untested */
- break;
- case 6: /* PII/PIII only like movsl with 8-byte alignment */
+ if (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO)
movsl_mask.mask = 7;
- break;
- case 15: /* P4 is OK down to 8-byte alignment */
- movsl_mask.mask = 7;
- break;
- }
#endif

intel_smp_check(c);
--
2.43.0